THE MEDIUM OF INFORMATION

                                 THE MEDIUM OF INFORMATION

         What makes a wise person in search for the truth credible if his conclusion he makes from what he reads in the news and TV is not the actual truth? The following counts should be considered and evaluated by one wise person:

1        There are 2 sides of a story. One must know how such reporter makes his conclusion to his writing was it tainted by influential people’s power of his money?

2        Was the reporter’s behavior discovered to be his best so that it is not pressured by his showing to his superior that he would make him proud of him even at the expense of the subject of the news, thus a rush judgment is subtly camouflaged?

3        Did the reporter make exhaustive investigation as to get documented evidences of accusations on the subject so that such report is not just one sided such as did he meet the subject in person to listen to his side of the issue, just as what is in front of a judge in a court setting?

4        Did the reporter make reliable discoveries on both sides of the disputing parties before doing his final expose’?

5        How would you rate such information from such newspaper or TV did it ever have a history of  its employees being sued  for libel as in the case of Dan Rather of  Channel 5 or so?

6        If ever you have read the Filipino Reporter under the direct supervision of Mr. Del Rosario the owner of such Filipino newspaper, you are hereby notified that what he published in the Nov. Issue about the reputation and damaging conclusion made on the JERMAC FORWARDERS EXPRESS, is a mistake: The Carinos Rosalinda and Johnny would like to voice out their side of the such news report!

7        Jermac Forwarders was a former UMAC FORWARDERS as shown in the front sign of its office at 71 Franklin Street, Belleville, New Jersey, upon which the sign Jermac is found on both sides part of the commercial sign fronting the Franklin Street. Umac Forwarders in Marikina, was formally notified by the Carinos that we changed the name into our own initials of our names of its members. Since Mr. Ben Carino the owner and  founder of the original UMAC FORWARDERS which was also a former FOREX  upon which Mr Ben Carino did not give a written cancellation of our being a Franchisee, therefore both Rosalinda and Johnny mistook it as a privilege because of Ben and Johnny were found out to be long lost brothers! The following counts should be considered first before one should make its own justification as to what made the delay of its customers boxes, upon which it is really misleading for what reason was its cause of the delay of deliveries:

A.     The start of the year 2010 the first shipment was on Feb. 17. It arrived in Manila south harbor on April 7.All charges for this shipment for the Custom, broker’s door to door service and shipping freight was paid in full. It should be this Feb. shipment that caused the screwing up of the succession of the rest of the shipments that followed it. Why? It is because the Hanjin freight Carino paid did not reach to Mario Bernardo for reason, Mr Alex Labandia the Hanjin Agent went home to Samar such that the delay of his endorsing Carino’s freight payment was only made after Alex came back to New Jersey in early June.

B.     Because of the delay in the freight payment, Mario kept on asking for extra charges as custom penalty, storage and demurrage. For this reason Rosalinda sent all daily collection pick-up money from the customers boxes, such that the shortage of funds was created! Should the fault be blamed on the Carino, if Mario assured the Carinos he will do something on the releases of the boxes from the Custom for that Feb shipment? 

C.     Do you call the situation that Carino is on the run as a fly by night if such truth is that Carino is now in Davao City since July 2010 to sacrifice its inherited 3-door- apartment in the heart of Davao City to look for a buyer so that the situation can   be solved by what was just one person screwed up the Carinos?

D.     Foremost of all, why is Carino can not get its original Title? It is because the Registry of Deeds lost it such that Carino has to go to court process of a Judge Petition for Certification of Lost, so that the Certification of Finality was only released Dec 15, 2010. It takes months to do this thing. Now the buyer is from the U.S, A, so that another procedure has to be set up through his wife who is here in Davao City. Therefore the process will take place after Christmas. Carino went through all the hardships about this situation, therefore. Carino should not be accused of being a criminal because Carino is a victim of corruption which is like a habitual blow on the poor defenseless Carino for so many occasions!

E.      I certify that the statements I made are true. If I willfully state any false statement I am aware I can be punished.

CONCLUSION:  Liberty and Justice, Liberty and Law, if one is allowed to do his / her own action for his own benefit ignoring the good of the other, then the freedom of speech is being blighted and abused by such Filipino Reporter!

Very truly yours,

/S/ROSALINDA O.CARINO